style: fix pre-existing ruff format drift#88
Merged
Conversation
Fixes 3 files that had fallen out of sync with ruff format on main, unblocking a clean rebase of a parked PR. Formatting only, no logic changes.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
1 participant
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Pre-existing
ruff formatdrift onmainin three files, unrelated to any feature work — fixing it somainis green and a parked PR (proto-mirror) can rebase cleanly.tesla_fleet_api/tesla/bluetooth.pytesla_fleet_api/tesla/vehicle/vehicle.pytesla_fleet_api/tessie/__init__.pyFormatting only (
uv run ruff formatoutput), no logic changes.uv run ruff checkand the test suite (371 passed) are unaffected.Note:
keytool.pyandtests/test_tessie_vehicle_params.pyalso failruff format --checkonmainbut are left out of this PR to keep it scoped to a single concern.